Balancing the Spiritualism with the Materialism
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enlightened
spiritual person never thinks about the luxury or even never thought about the
pleasure, while materialist never wants to leave all the luxury or even they
never try to spend the time for other valuable things in life. In the case of
balanced life, both are unfulfilled that either spiritualism
or materialism. Balancing a life is a very difficult task in the world;
moreover, it is certainly impossible to have such a beautiful quality. Thinking
and analyzing of both the aspects makes man to be miserable, on the contrary,
living and accepting both the aspects makes man to be mystical. Experiencing
everything makes man perfect in any matter to deal it, perfectly. Hence,
experience comes through the meditation practice but not from the conditioning.
Ordinary
person condition everything except experiencing a situation. According to the Osho,
reacting to a situation is a sign of our mind, while responding to a situation
is a sign of our heart or being. However, Alertness with some little
intelligence makes us to ignore the projections of mind in order to make them
to diminish. Whereas J.Krishnamurthy revealed the truth that the
complete attentiveness makes us pure and divine. In my experience, reaching to
the self is nothing but an act of spiritualism, while going away from the self
represents the act of materialism. Witness itself represents the self said
by [Osho], and obstructing the truth to be existed is itself the act of mind [J.KrishnaMurthy].
Nevertheless, both are the statements which represent two sides (perceptions)
of a coin such as self (soul).
Taking responsibility is the solution for each and every problem, if we concern either inner or outer world. But, responding to a situation is not a responsibility as such it is the actual meaning of responsibility. On the contrary, in the society, responsibility meant to be taking whole burden and feeling whole pain to achieve some deadly, rotten, and foamy position in this miserable and barbarous world. Every act which is against to the nature, is against to the self, is against to the inner voice, and is against to the existence is a destructive perhaps. It is certain that the one who know nothing about outer is a luxurious person compared to one who has everything in outer but has nothing in inner.
Taking responsibility is the solution for each and every problem, if we concern either inner or outer world. But, responding to a situation is not a responsibility as such it is the actual meaning of responsibility. On the contrary, in the society, responsibility meant to be taking whole burden and feeling whole pain to achieve some deadly, rotten, and foamy position in this miserable and barbarous world. Every act which is against to the nature, is against to the self, is against to the inner voice, and is against to the existence is a destructive perhaps. It is certain that the one who know nothing about outer is a luxurious person compared to one who has everything in outer but has nothing in inner.
Comments
Post a Comment